Very Good!

very good

Thanks

Great

Good

good

Tying the assignments to an Android Studio project was overkill; the same principles could have been demonstrated with a SIMPLE java application.

this is a very nice course, it's kind of primary, i guess it can use much more practical examples rather than using the dog and cat examples.

I don't know why the examples are Android applications. It would have been easier to use python or even java running the virtual machine.

this course taught about different of software design and architecture thank you so much

Good introductory course in Object Oriented Programming

The course is not good and not bad. It introduces you to software design principles by describing some concepts. However, it is highly (too) abstract: you usually do not understand how to apply these principles in real software. Moreover, instead of explaining it, the course just provides you some analogies from the real life. So, this course can be considered as a glossary of buzzwords, not more. Also, there are no control of your knowledge or understanding. Instead of some objective control, the assignments are reviewed by different learners, and you do not know: either your assignment is correct or a reviewer does not understand the material in the same way as you or the reviewer just marked your assignment as correct without reviewing. Additionally, this course teaches you that data class is anti-pattern. No comments here.

Content was good, but the assignments are not. The final capstone assignment is largely a copy-paste exercise from a line-by-line tutorial, based on an Android app. Those without expertise in Android will find themselves having to learn that first, even though it should be unnecessary given the content. The assignment does not actual demonstrate any of the concepts from the class. Peer discussion forums are almost entirely people asking for reviews rather than any meaningful discussion.

I've expected more from Coursera. This particular course contends more outdated information, weird questions that are not going to help in the real-life daily job. Week 4 which is supposed to be the big project contains a lot of copy-paste and all thinking activity how to use Android studio. Knowledge of UML diagrams was not tested, all code that supposed to be written by a course listener was already provided, no thinking was required. Disappointed

Poorly prepared course very boring material and grading system is awful you must grade three other student tasks and they must grade you so in case you all missed something you all pass from tasks but a fake pass because you are all missing something Coursera peer grading system is the worst I have ever seen

Too oriented towards Java, peer graded assigments are too many. Given code doesn't work easily for someone who has not experience with Android Studio.

Not happy with the examples are given and not more interactive one .

__

I am enjoying the lesson until I face the Capstone project where we need to write all properties and methods of each classes. Not to mention, the classes included in the template is not even the main classes, instead it uses the Android built-in libraries which I think is out of context of learning. Additionally, there are students who evaluate project unfair, despite writing my intention. I was going to enrol and pay for the monthly fee but this changed my mind. Let me know if you adjusted this course and remove the peer evaluation.

The course is outdated and neglected. A lot of mistakes and inaccuracies, especially. Inconsistencies in the tasks with what was given in the lessons before. The requirements specify a basic knowledge of Java and a simple syntax comprehension test is conducted. But it actually provides legacy code for a specific environment. And in order to set up these legacy compatibilities and run the project, you need a fairly deep understanding of this particular environment. No help from teachers and community.

Honestly, this course is very poor and doesnt gives you necessary tools to model a object oriented solution in UML. The exercises need to be more real , what i mean is there isnt any code to help us to understand the real application of UML in POO.

The hands-on project setup is tedious. A more simple setup should be looked after, as setting up Android Studio plus Java for such basic code is just not practical.

Please don't take this course. The course assignments and materials except video is completely broken. There are so many things which doesn't make sense with other.

don't waste your money. Watch talks on youtube, you will gain more from a 1h talk at a conference than 10h from this course

dull, it's better to have presenter who knows what he/she is talking about.